We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Was the Least Deadly Weapon in Military History?

Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At DelightedCooking, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Love and war might seem like polar opposites, but in 1994, the U.S. military thought that using one might help with the other. Under the directive of the Department of Defense, researchers at Ohio's Wright Laboratory proposed developing a so-called "gay bomb": a chemical weapon that, in theory, would make enemy combatants fall in love with one another, and therefore be much less inclined to engage in warfare.

According to the lab's three-page proposal, for about $7.5 million USD, they would create an explosive weapon that, when detonated, would release chemicals "that would cause enemy soldiers to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistibly attractive to one another." However, there wasn't any research backing up the feasibility of their plan. Luckily, sane minds prevailed, and no such bomb was ever made, nor were any of the other far-fetched ideas that the lab came up with, such as flatulence and bad-breath bombs, as well as an explosive device that would cause stinging insects to come and attack anyone exposed.

Other military misses:

  • During World War II, the U.S. military developed – and canceled – a "bat bomb" that would deploy thousands of bats and theoretically ruin Japanese paper-and-wood homes.

  • The Soviet Union tried to train dogs to crawl beneath Nazi tanks with bombs attached, but the dogs mostly ran away from the gunfire.

  • The French Maginot Line was meant to block German forces from attacking in World War II, but the Germans simply went around it.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.