We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Is the Front Page of "The New York Times" Always Accurate?

Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGEEK, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Despite false claims that news outlets print and broadcast “fake news,” journalists all over the world painstakingly try to correct every published error. But one typo survived undetected for 102 years on the front page of the venerable New York Times.

The stealth typo first appeared on the front page of the February 7, 1898 edition of the Times. The night before that issue was published, an unknown editor made a mathematical error, increasing issue No. 14,499 from February 6 to issue No. 15,000 on February 7. In the confusion, 500 issues disappeared overnight, and no one caught the error for over a century -- until a news assistant did some research in December 1999 and discovered the problem. On January 1, 2000, the Times fixed the error and published a correction.

Tracking down the typo:

  • Manually updating the issue number every day was a recipe for disaster, the 24-year-old news assistant had told his editors. So he combed through thousands of archival issues and eventually found the gaffe.

  • In the New Year's Day issue, the Times reported, in part: “The 500-issue error persisted until yesterday (No. 51,753) … today the Times turns back the clock to correct the sequence: this issue is No. 51,254.”

  • While sometimes embarrassing, newspapers always try to correct errors. That day’s correction included the realization that “an article on March 14, 1995, celebrating the arrival of No. 50,000, was 500 days premature. It should have appeared on July 26, 1996.”

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.